| 
               
                This books subtitle, "Microcredit, Barefoot Banking, and the
                Business Solution for Ending Poverty", really tells you the
                scope of what the authors intend for their book: no less than
                ENDING POVERTY. While I think microcredit is a powerful
                innovation, that is perhaps a bit of an overreach.
               
              
                The better part of the book is written from the philanthropist's
                perspective which, I must admit, I found a little offputting.
                Yes, I know there are people out there working hard to figure
                out the best way to donate the vast sums of money they've accumulated
                over their lives. I, however, have yet to accumulate the
                aforementioned vast sums so I am still working that problem.
                When A Billion Bootstraps delves into the details of how
                microcredit really functions on the other hand, it shines.
               
              
                Smith & Thurman make an excellent argument that charity
                actually holds back development. They point to the example of a
                famine caused by crop losses in Africa. Free food gets donated
                and routed to famine stricken areas. Consumers prioritize the
                free food to the detriment of local producers who are already
                reeling from crop losses. Instead of getting the boon of
                temporary high prices for their crops that could lead to
                reinvestment in agriculture, charity drives the price of their
                goods to effectively zero. Then, when the next agricultural
                hardship inevitably comes along, it leads to a worse famine because there
                are fewer farmer due to so many being driven out of business!
               
              
                Of course, since so much of the microcredit industry is
                dependent on donors, one wonders if they are kicking the legs
                out from under their own argument. In terms of ROI the authors
                make a much stronger case: because such a high percentage of
                loans are paid back, the money can be reloaned multiple times
                giving many families the opportunity to advance with the same
                capital. It's the old adage of give a man a fish, feed him
                for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime writ
                large to some extent.
              |