| 
               
                This book is dry in the extreme. To honor that, this review will
                itself be extremely dry. Just kidding...or am I? You decide. It
                took me a year to wade though Relentless Evolution and I
                certainly wouldn't recommend it as a light beach read. The
                citations along extend for over a hundred pages!
               
              Adaptive Evolution
              
                Thompson opens his tome talking about adaptation. This seems
                to be as good a place to start as any. Adaptation is certain
                traits which lead to successful reproduction in a given
                environment being favored in that environment. This provides a
                nice entry for him to talk about how whereas once we saw
                evolution as a long historical process today we can see viruses,
                insects, bacteria and other organisms with short reproduction
                times evolve. Indeed, it seems like there's a new strain of the
                flu to fight off every year.
               
              Natural Selection
              
                This'd be your classic Darwinian process: more individuals with
                variant A of a trait survive to reproduce than those individuals with variant
                B or C of said trait. Thompson's examples here include butterflies,
                cod and, in the human altered environment of hospitals, drug
                resistant bacteria.
               
              Genes
              
                  More butterflies, moths, sticklebacks, mice, flax and even dogs
                  are employed to show how genes - proteins transcribed from DNA
                  - form traits in the animals carrying them.
               
              Genomes
              
                It talking about whole genomes, that is, whole organisms, Thompson's
                examples stick to sealife and plants. He spends a great deal of
                time discussing polyploidy, the duplication of genomes. Most multicellular
                creatures like to think of themselves as diploid, receiving a
                genome copy from each parent. The exceptions to this are
                instructive.
               
              
                Male ants are not diploid; they only get a single
                copy. Thus all the female offspring of a queen (sisters) carry 75% of the
                same genetic material whereas any female's offspring will only
                have half her genes. Colony behavior makes complete sense in
                this light.
               
              
                On the other end are plants, which can be successfully tetraploid.
                This doubling can even be repeated over multiple generations
                leading to 8, 16 or more copies of the genome in a single
                organism!
               
              
                Last of all there is hybridization, where two separate species
                join their genomes to produce offspring. You know, like Ligers
                and Tigons.
               
              Genome Coevolution
              
                Here Thompson considers the evolutionary basis of symbiosis.
                Sadly he does not mention the dangers of picking up spider suits
                in distant galaxies. He does go into some detail about the human
                microbiome, however, which is interesting.
               
              Genome Conflict
              
                Microbiota, nuclear-mitochondrial conflict, parasites, etc. all shape
                an organism's genome. Perhaps the most interesting anecdote here
                is that of Wolbachia, a bacteria which infects insects and can
                cause infected individuals to only be able to successfully
                procreate with other infected individuals, kill off males, and
                other insidious things.
               
              Adaptive Variation
              
                At some point this book really starts to repeat itself. This is
                the first chapter in which we encounter the Galapagos finches.
                Rest assured. It will not be the last. Variation within a
                species' population can add to the fitness of that population
                by allowing for quick responses to changing circumstances, i.e.
                changing your beak size when El Niño comes knocking at your
                door.
               
              Recombination & Reproduction
              
                Sex! You'd think Thompson couldn't possibly make that subject
                a bore. And you'd be wrong. Oh, and horizontal gene transfer is
                probably more important than we realize.
               
              Divergence
              
                Thompson focuses on the variation of moths, specifically those
                in the genus Greya living in the western United States.
                Different species have evolved different ranges to prey on the
                same plants and to prey on different plants in the same
                geographic ranges. This moth and the flowers in its life will
                be a recurrent theme in Thompson's discussion of coevolution.
               
              Local Adaptation
              
                Species randomly spread to new areas. Places distinct from
                their home ranges in any number of ways can exert selective
                pressure. This is the driving force behind local adaptation.
               
              Coevolutionary Dynamics
              
                  Species sometimes evolve TOGETHER. Imagine that.
               
              Geography
              
                Here Thompson appears to repeat a lot of what he said in the
                chapter on local adaption with different examples. I'm not sure
                why this chapter is here other than to showcase all these
                examples. Maybe that's how one gets their bibliography over 100
                pages...
               
              Experiments!
              
                Since most evolution science tends to be descriptive, I found
                Thompson's 13th chapter to be a special treat. Of course, because
                of the finite nature of the human lifespan, these experiments
                tend to focus on species that reproduce quickly like bacteria.
               
              Ecological Speciation
              
                Here we find a continuation of the foregoing chapters on local
                adaption, but focused on when one can declare separate species.
                Mainly this focuses on whether when they hybridize they can
                produce viable offspring.
               
              Reticulate Diversification
              
                The discussion of hybrids continues, referring back to our old
                friend the Greya moth among other examples. Sadly no
                discussion of the Liger or Tigon was included.
               
              Species Interactions & Radiations
              
                Local adaption plus coevolution expounded upon in copious examples.
               
              Webs
              
                Coevolution as mentioned earlier highlighted binary examples,
                that is, two species evolving together. Nature is rarely so
                simple. In most cases there is a whole host of species interacting
                together in a web.
               
              Perceptions of Evolution
              
                Thompson argues that scientists need to stop using euphemisms and
                just say evolution. He would know. He's used every single one at
                some point in this book. Still,  I can't agree more! The word "evolution" is
                something like "Voldemort" when communicating with the general
                public. The historical conflict between scientific worldviews is,
                of course, to blame, and I, like Richard Dawkins, believe we need
                to firmly state which side of that argument we fall on. Say
                evolution!
               
              -- Coda --
              
                I initially picked up Relentless Evolution because of
                
                  a review in Science
                
                which, as I remember, portrayed it as being somewhat more
                exciting. Perhaps one will find value in comparing that
                analysis to the current one.
               
             |